The Debating Chamber Forum Index New Zealand Centre for Political Research - www.nzcpr.com
NZCPR Weekly
Politics in Schools on Trial
This week: NZCPR looks at a British High Court ruling that Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth' is unfit for showing in schools, the NZCPR Guest Bruce Logan discusses the loss of confidence within our education system, and the NZCPR Poll asks whether NZ children need protecting from political propaganda in the classroom...
Schools around New Zealand that are using Al Gore's controversial film 'An Inconvenient Truth' to promote the Government's climate change agenda should be warned that a High Court ruling in Britain has just found that the film is unfit for schools.
Last Tuesday, a British High Court Judge ruled that school children need protecting from political propaganda like Al Gore's creative film making. The Court action was taken by Stewart Dimmock, a lorry driver and school governor from Kent who argued that his 11 and 14 year old sons should not be subjected to political propaganda and 'brainwashing' in the classroom: "I wish my children to have the best education possible, free from bias and political spin, and Mr Gore's film falls far short of the standard required", he said.
Mr Dimmock was responding to the Labour Government's decision to send copies of Al Gore's film to more than 3,800 schools in England. The film was part of a Climate Change Resource Pack aimed at children aged 11 to 14 years.
During the three-day hearing the Court heard that Al Gore's film contained serious scientific inaccuracies, that it was 'politically partisan', and that it contained 'sentimental mush'. The Government was accused of backing the film as a way of 'brainwashing' pupils on global warming.
As part of the evidence, it was pointed out that Al Gore himself has gone on record saying that it was appropriate to over-represent the facts on global warming in his film 'An Inconvenient Truth' in order to get the message across: "I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is". (To read Al Gore's full interview in Grist Magazine click here
While Mr Justice Baron will deliver his ruling in the case later this week, he has already stated that the film promotes "partisan political views" and that schools will need to issue a warning to the students before they show it. He has determined that the Government must amend the Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that the film is a political work that promotes only one side of the argument, and he has also decided that the eleven serious inaccuracies in the film that have been identified by the Court, must be pointed out to the children.
The eleven inaccuracies the High Court identified in the movie are:
1.The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
2.The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
3.The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
4.The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
5.The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
6.The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
7.The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
8.The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
9.The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
10.The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
11.The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government was unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim. (For more information see
This case against the British Government has only been possible because of amendments to the British Education Act which prohibit political indoctrination by banning the teaching of partisan political views and by requiring that political issues are presented in a balanced manner.
Section 406 of the Education Act 1996 states that local education authorities, school governing bodies and head teachers "shall forbid... the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school". And if political issues are brought to the attention of school pupils, the authority, the governors and the head are required by Section 407 to take "such steps as are reasonably practicable to secure that... they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views".
The New Zealand Education Act does not have such clear safeguards to protect children from indoctrination by political propaganda. That is undoubtedly why the school curriculum not only teaches children about environmental activism (listing Greenpeace as a useful resource for primary school children) but also Maori activism by listing as a resource the Maori Independence site where the introduction states: "Maori have a long tradition of struggle and resistance against colonisation and the Crown sponsored theft of Maori land and resources. This site focuses on the ongoing struggle for Tino Rangatiratanga and the people who continue to resist the pressures of colonisation and cultural and economic genocide". (To visit the site click here
The infiltration of partisan politics is now imbedded within the New Zealand education curriculum.
This week's NZCPR Guest Commentator, Bruce Logan, a former teacher and founder of Maxim Institute, puts it this way: During the 1970s I taught in secondary schools in Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand, and in each country, the process was the same - English and history curricula became politicised. Literature was distorted to promote ready-made social attitudes. Instead of taking a text for study in order to learn something about human nature, literature was beginning to be used as a lever for instilling fashionable social messages around topics such as 'racism' and 'sexism', or Neo-Marxist-inspired insights to 'class consciousness'. (To read Bruce's article click the sidebar link>>>)
While many countries have now retreated from this outcomes-based approach to learning in favour of a more traditional focus on syllabus and standards, New Zealand is continuing down the radical path. Next month the Government's controversial new curriculum will be released, which replaces the teaching of facts, figures and general knowledge, with the teaching of skills such as how to hold a conversation, and how to ask for help! (To read Curriculum Change shifts emphasis from 'what' to 'how', click here
The British High Court case has reminded us that education should be free from political bias with facts being presented in a fair and impartial way. Given the increasing politicisation of our curriculum, surely it is time to introduce into our education act the same safeguards that British children have in theirs?
The poll this week asks do you think the New Zealand children should be protected from political indoctrination by introducing provisions into the Education Act that are similar to British law to "forbid the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school" and if a political issue is raised, to ensure that "they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views".
*Poll (now on top right of NZCPR.com homepage): This week's poll asks whether you think that New Zealand children should be protected from political indoctrination by introducing provisions into the Education Act that are similar to British law to "forbid the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school" and if a political issue is raised, to ensure that "they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views"?
Comments received during the week on the column and the poll will be posted here
*Last week's poll asked: Do you believe the government should be interfering with the pricing mechanism of free markets? Result: 4% Yes, 96% No You can read the hundreds of comments submitted by readers by clicking here
*Housekeeping:
Please feel free to forward this newsletter on to others who you think would be interested. A printer-friendly version can be found on the NZCPR.com website.
Don't forget that we are always keen to consider publication of opinion pieces for the website Soapbox Series - to send in your submission please click here
To contact Muriel about this week's column please click here
NZCPR Weekly is a free weekly newsletter by Dr Muriel Newman of the New Zealand Centre for Political Research, a web-based forum at www.nzcpr.com
If you have a change of address, please note your old address and your new one and click here
NZCPR
Commentary
A LOSS OF CONFIDENCE
Bruce Logan
We should not be surprised that schools are now places in which we can find increasing violence, a lack of respect for the past, a prejudicial ignorance of religion - especially Christianity - falling academic standards, increasing failure, particularly among boys and a general atmosphere of ennui among teachers.
Ironically an increasing demand for children's rights continues to be reinforced by the state.
Probably the most obvious reason for this bleak state of affairs is the loss of confidence
in our own culture and past.
WHAT'S NEW?
*SPAM FILTERS With work spam filters getting more stringent you might like to "white-list" the newsletter (ask your ISP) or change your delivery address to your home email...
*Local Body Elections
Don't forget to vote - check out the Election07 website
*Mid-Week Politics Mid-Week Politics published every Wednesday on NZCPR.com
*NEW LOOK Website
Check out the new format for the NZCPR.com Homepage - helping to keep you better informed..
*GETTING INVOLVED 1.Electoral Finance Bill
If you value free speech join the NZCPR campaign and email MPs to share your concerns ...more
2.Climate Change Have your say on Climate change - last chance to complete the survey. Results will be posted Mid Week ...more
New survey on tax coming up - but you must register for the Research Panel to take part in the surveys...more
LHave you had your say on the MMP poll?...more
*ON THE FORUM 1.Kristen Challenges Al Gore
15 year old Kristen Byrnes says Al Gore's movie "doesn't belong in schools. If it makes its way into schools an opposing viewpoint should be given as much time". Kristen set up a website "Ponder the Maunder" to critique the movie and teachers from around the world are now using it...
This week's quote of the week from Poll Replies on regulating the free market is from Duncan:
Free markets allow for free interaction between seller and purchaser. The sellers compete with each other on the basis of price and product so that the seller responds to what the purchaser needs and desires. When the government gets involved it makes decisions not on what the customer wants and needs but on what it perceives is good for its own political survival and the benefit to its own lackeys - bureaucrats, beneficiaries and unionists. Who loses? If history is anything to go by, it leads ultimately to poverty and tyranny. The only difference between the current crop of Marxists and the old communists is that it doesn't use guns; it just takes a bit longer to get to the same place...
Click to subscribe to NBR FREE ALERTS
Comments