Title -- 4923 EAST TIMOR: Arab columnist sacked over criticism of Indonesia
Date -- 20 April 2006
Byline -- None
Origin -- Pacific Media Watch
Source -- Washington Post via email@example.com (p. A15) 15/4/6
Copyright - WP
Status -- Unabridged
* Pacific Media Watch Online - check the website for archive and links:
* Post a comment on this story at PMW's Right of Reply:
HOW TO LOSE YOUR JOB AT A SAUDI NEWSPAPER
By Fawaz Turki
WASHINGTON: (Washington Post/Pacific Media Watch): I was unceremoniously fired this month by my Saudi newspaper, a leading English-language daily called Arab News.
It didn't matter that I had been the senior columnist on the op-ed page for
nine years or that my work was quoted widely in the European and American
media, including this paper. What mattered was that I had committed one of the
three cardinal sins an Arab journalist must avoid when working for the Arab
press: I criticized the government.
The other two? Bringing up Islam as an issue and criticizing, by name,
political leaders in the Arab or Islamic world for their brazen excesses,
dismal failures and blatant abuses.
Never mind that a newspaper cheapens and debases the idea of the journalistic
enterprise when it enjoins its commentators against being critical of the
government that it is supposed to be a watchdog over. Never mind the absurdity
of preventing your contributors from touching on the issue of Islam, a social
ideology whose embrace by jihadists is the top news story in the world today.
And never mind that Arab society -- a society that remains broken in body and
spirit more than a half-century after independence -- needs very much to
engage in serious self-assessment and to promote an open debate in the media
among intellectuals, academics, political analysts and others about why Arabs
have failed all these years to meet the challenges of modernity.
But those are the stringent, not to mention pathetic, rules that determine how
the Arab press conducts its business. You play by these rules or you're cut
off. The problem is that if stringing words together is the only way you know
how to make a living, you end up eating humble pie and playing the game by
whatever rules they set for you.
Sometimes all it takes is a phone call to someone high up in your paper from a
semi-literate government official who couldn't run a lunch counter, or a
fundamentalist imam who hasn't read a half-dozen decent books in his life, or
perhaps a disgruntled diplomat at a Muslim or Arab embassy in Riyadh who
didn't like what you had to say in your column about his country. The result
is the same: Your career is ruined.
Sometimes, if you're lucky, you will have an editorial page editor who likes
your work, and he'll cut you a bit of slack and lobby on your behalf behind
the scenes, often at the risk of losing his own job. But even in this case,
three strikes and you're out.
My first provocation was -- horror of horrors -- to criticize Egyptian leader
Hosni Mubarak after he cracked down on human rights activists several years
ago. My second occurred soon after the failure of the Camp David accords when
I called for the resignation of Yasser Arafat as head of the Palestinian
My last was to write about the atrocities Indonesia had committed during its
occupation of East Timor from 1975 to 1999. For that transgression, my Saudi
paper showed no mercy. I was out the door. No questions asked, no explanations
given. You don't write about atrocities committed by an Islamic government --
even when they're already documented in the history books -- and hope to get
away with it.
But this is not just the story of an Arab journalist losing his job. It is a
story with implications for the current American administration's efforts to
"introduce" the Arab countries to democracy, of which independent, free media
are a major building block.
What Arabs, including those masquerading as their newspaper editors, have yet
to learn is that a free press, a truly free press, is a moral imperative in
society. Subvert it, and you subvert the public's sacrosanct right to know and
a newspaper's traditional role to expose. If the Western democracies work
better than many others, it is because to them the concept of accountability,
expected from the head of state on down, is a crucial function of their
What Arabs have yet to learn, in addition to that, is that newspapers are not
published to advance the political preferences of proprietors, or the
commentary of subservient analysts who turn a blind eye to the abuse of power
by political leaders running their failed states.
Democracy may be a political system, but it is also a social ethos. How
responsive can a country be to such an ethos when its people have, for
generations, existed with an ethic of fear -- fear of originality, fear of
innovation, fear of spontaneity, fear of life itself -- and have had instilled
in them the need to accept orthodoxy, dependence and submission?
The Arab world today, sadly, remains a collection of disparate entities ruled
for the most part by authoritarian regimes that rely on coercion, violence and
terror to rule, and that demand from their citizens submission, obedience and
conformity. And that includes those citizens who call themselves
"journalists," to whom, by now, responsibility to truth and logic has become
In this atmosphere, it is regarded as an example of reportorial acumen to
write on the op-ed pages of prominent Arab journals about how the Sept. 11,
2001, attacks were the work of Israeli agents, how the death of Princess Diana
was the result of some diabolical plot by British intelligence to end her life
rather than see her married to an Arab Muslim, how Monica Lewinsky was an
agent-in-place, put in the White House by the "Jewish lobby" -- and so on with
other infantile whimsies.
For Arabs, there is still a great divide between word and world. You can
embrace conspiracy theories with impressive ease, and be accorded by your
editors the right to pontificate about any foolish thing you want, but don't
dare write about the malfeasance of political leaders in Egypt and Palestine,
or the atrocities of a fellow-Muslim government in East Timor. The price you
must pay for such offenses if you work for the Arab press is heavy indeed.
* Fawaz Turki is a journalist living in Washington and the author of several
books, including "The Disinherited: Journal of a Palestinian Exile." His
e-mail address firstname.lastname@example.org
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH ONLINE
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH is an independent, non-profit, non-government organisation comprising journalists, lawyers, editors and other media workers, dedicated to examining issues of ethics, accountability, censorship, media freedom and media ownership in the Pacific region.
(c)1996-2006 Copyright - All rights reserved.
Items are provided solely for review purposes as a non-profit educational service. Copyright remains the property of the original producers as indicated in the header. Recipients should seek permission from the copyright owner for any publishing. Copyright owners not wishing their materials to be posted by PMW please contact us. The views expressed in material listed by PMW are not necessarily the views of PMW or its members.
Recipients should rely on their own inquiries before making decisions based on material listed in PMW. Please copy appeals to PMW and acknowledge source.
For further information, inquiries about joining the Pacific Media Watch listserve, articles for publication, and giving feedback contact Pacific Media Watch at:
Fax: (+679) 30 5779
Mail: PO Box 78028, Auckland 1002, Aotearoa/New Zealand
Website: www.pmw.c2o.org <http://www.pmw.c2o.org>