Our friend Zen is not happy that the Government has decreed that Folic acid is to be added to our bread.
Our food safety minister (I bet you didn't know we had a one of those), Annette King has ruled that humble bakers throughout the land must add this supplement to our bread.
Food Safety Minister Annette King yesterday said the decision, jointly made with Australia, was "a triumph for humanity and common sense".
In New Zealand the acid would be added as the bread was made and Australia had decided to add it to flour -- something the New Zealand Green Party opposed.
"New Zealand women do not get enough natural folate in the diet to prevent a large number of babies being born with devastating neural tube defects, the most common of which are spina bifida and hydrocephalus," Ms King said.
The trouble is of course folate is a member of the B vitamin group and the best source of B vitamins is animal products. The very things that nutritionists have been saying for years we eat too much of.
Anyway when the new regulations take effect 100 gms bread (which must be just about the whole damn loaf, no?) will contain about as much folate as 1/2 of one chicken liver. A slice of toast with pate would just about meet a pregnant woman's daily dietary requirement (as it is defined to be today) for folate without the need for any to be added to the bread.
But don't let any inconvienant facts get in the way of a new government regulation.
Of course this whole folate thing is predicated on epidemiological studies which don't always turn out the way you want.
As in this study in the British Medical Journal where taking folate suppliments is linked to an increased probability of a woman developing breast cancer.
Of course pointing such studies out to big government types will meet with the response that it was just chance that led to such results.
Which it quite possibly was - but the same argument applies to the studies they use to justify new regulations on the baking of bread.
Funny that.

If people need folic Acid. they can take a supplement. It should not be forced upon the population via the bread supply. Some people could have a allergic reaction to it. Like all the food products that are overly fortified with iron. My brother suffers from a medical condition to having too much iron in his blood and has to be very careful on what food products he gets, because of the over dosing of iron in so many food products these days.
Nanny state likes to force it's will on us when it comes to certain health issues regardless of the long term consequences. I.E Fluoridation, etc and at the same times it's trying to regulate our choice of vitamin and health supplements.
Posted by: AcidComments | June 24, 2007 at 05:54 PM
The justification for mass medication of virtually the entire population, minus home bread bakers and organic buyers, with artificial folate, is that it will reduce rates of birth defects.
Ignoring for a moment the reality that folated bread won't do much for the average young expectant mother, who is not a traditionally large consumer of bread, should we consider the causes behind the increase in birth defect rates (assuming, of course, that they are on the increase)?
Aspartame, also known by its proprietory brand name, is an artificial sweetener used increasingly since its accidental discovery in 1965. It can now be found in pretty much anything labelled as "diet" or lite".
Aspartame is made from three things, aspartic acid and phenylanaline, which are amino acids, and methanol, which is a lower alcohol, an industial solvent, and a physical and neurotoxin. Methanol - or methyl alcohol - is the stuff in methylated spirits (meths) which makes winos go blind. Aspartame contains 11% methanol.
Methanol is metabolised in the human body by alcohol dehydrogenase, an enzyme which converts it into first formaldehyde, and then formic acid. These chemicals attack the optic nerve and the retina, and also cause permanent damage to mitochondrial DNA, resulting in birth defects in children born to mothers who have consumed methanol, or who have consumed aspartame which then breaks down releasing methanol.
Methanol is processed slowly by the body, taking anything up to four days to leave the system. Formaldehyde and formic acid are cumulative in their effect. The longer they remain in the system, the worse the cumulative damage becomes.
Fortunately, it is known that folic acid greatly speeds the body's metabolism of formic acid, and it is used along with ethanol (regular drinking alcohol) in the treatment of methanol poisoning. Ethanol is used because the body processes different alcohols in strict order, starting with ethanol; while alcohol dehydrogenase is tied up dealing with the ethanol, it can't convert the methanol into it's deadly byproducts, formaldehyde and formic acid. Folic acid, and at least one proprietory drug based on it, are used to eliminate formic acid from the body before it does too much damage.
It may be that an increasing birth defect rate coinciding with the increased use of aspartame is purely coincidental; but we do know that the one does cause the other, and while it is certainly not the only cause, surely it must make sense, if we wish to decease the birth defect rate, to ban the use of something which we know to be one of its causes, rather than add a partial cure to a food source which is unlikely to materially affect the target demographic?
Expectant mothers probably do have enough folate in their diets to deal with any methanol which they may consume from natural sources - fruit products, wine, and the like - but may not be consuming enough to deal with the added burden of methanol sourced from aspartame.
Now I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that many people would believe the Minister, being a member of the current Cabinet, is either not very bright, or is perhaps questionably motivated, or possibly both; but maybe she just isn't aware of this process of metabolism, and hasn't heard of the perils of the aforementioned substance before.
Either way, I don't believe that adding folate to bread will work, and in any case, compulsory mass medication of an entire population isn't good Government, it's Nazism.
Posted by: newt | June 24, 2007 at 06:32 PM
AcidComments, the editor of the Sunday Star Times says we shouldn't use the term "Nanny State". Please cease and desist. Thank you.
G
Posted by: Grant ( a new one) | June 24, 2007 at 09:38 PM
I wonder why they chose bread as their product of choice to add folate to.
Posted by: Lucyna | June 24, 2007 at 10:54 PM
Notice that the initiative is being taken at same time as Australia, so it must be well considered.
Also the quantity of folic acid is a very small percentage indeed.
Have any hazards been identified.
Posted by: carol | June 24, 2007 at 11:01 PM
That's got me wondering as well, Lucyna, I mean if they really wanted to target potential mothers, then maybe they could have chosen RTDs or coffee or KFC or Lite Milk or 101 other things, which young mothers are known to consume.
But maybe the particular form of Folic Acid, which has its copyright owned by the particular company which is paying them to promote this particular line, binds most effectively to wheat flour. I mean who would question that.....it's scientific and all that, y'know?
Posted by: newt | June 24, 2007 at 11:06 PM
has anyone thought that maybe instead of adding this stuff into bread they should be subsidising the cost of folic acid supplements, hell how about for pregnant women with a doctors script they get it for free. but then again we arent allowed to have choices in NZ anymore are we.
Posted by: kiwitrouthunter | June 25, 2007 at 06:36 PM
Dear Mr Kiwitrouthunter;
Do you not realize that we cannot trust the women of New Zealand especially those of a darker hue to take the medicine that is good for them.
Thus it is decreed that all New Zealanders, regardless of race gender, sexual orientation or age and in the name of egalitate, shall be vitamized.
Posted by: andrei | June 25, 2007 at 07:56 PM
FDA Issues New Safety Rules for Vitamins
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/22/ap3849439.html
For the first time, manufacturers of vitamins, herbal pills and other dietary supplements will have to test all of their products' ingredients, the Food and Drug Administration announced Friday.
The agency is phasing in the new rule, which is designed to address concerns that existing federal regulations allowed supplements onto the market that were contaminated or didn't contain the dietary ingredients claimed on the label.
Posted by: dave | June 26, 2007 at 07:44 PM
"Thus it is decreed that all New Zealanders, regardless of race gender, sexual orientation or age and in the name of egalitate, shall be vitamized. "
so sayeth the nanny state
Posted by: kiwitrouthunter | June 26, 2007 at 08:55 PM
It is better to take organic foods and vitamins only. Stay away from synthetic vitamins.
Amanda
Posted by: best multivitamin | August 02, 2011 at 09:13 PM