My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« Humanity is a pollutant | Main | Climate change week continues at TBR »

Comments

maynard

Oh Bravo Andrei! Couldn't agree with you more, how eloquently put.

It appears there's a whole nest of them located in a hive like structure in Wellington. They enforce conformity in the host population upon which they feed, yet we all know it is only to serve their own selfish needs.

Fire is the only solution when dealing with parasitic hives - perhaps that's why fireworks have all but been banned?

peasant

What does unicus mean?

dad4justice

A Viking a day keeps Helen at bay . Row , row , row . Where are the penguins going Captain Hearty , iceberg port side . Oh well , who turned the freezer switch off ?

David W

Unicus, in latin at least, means unique or only. If that's was Andrei meant then I don't get it.

AVG

Andrei & Maynard both right.Labour is deliberately using scare tactics and empty rhetoric that they are going to fix things as their re-election strategy. Frighten folks enough and they do not think.

peter

The article in the Indian paper is complete and utter rubbish. Those calculations would have been based on completely inappropriate assumptions. For example many of those on connecting flights would have been on routine services.

Right wing propaganda for sure!

AVG

Peter. Thank you for your objectivity. It would be nice if a few more had it .

dad4justice

Talking about "objectivity " wasn't it so refreshing and nice to see piffle petros post a comment without the words "fundamental Christian."

PhilBest

Note this little exchange that I've just participated in on Kiwiblog. (Sorry, I can't be bothered typing a fresh comment, and I thought copying and pasting this would say what I want to say here as well).

# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

Yeah, the science is settled, yadda, yadda, yadda.

http://www.dailytech.com/100+Prominent+Scientists+Warn+UN+Attempting+to+Control+Climate+Futile/article10032.htm
# Andrew W Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

The same names Phil, always the same 100 names, though this time they’ve had to chuck in a few “scientist” economists and engineers to get the numbers up.
# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 5:06 pm

Yeah, but look at the CREDENTIALS among that lot.

Where’s the IPCC’s list of the famous “2,500″ with THEIR credentials, AND their input to the reports?

Rule of thumb: if the process has to be secret and public debate has to be censored, it is NOT “science”.

Also, you SAID: “the Earth is warming, it is a global phenomenon, there must be a driver, an enhanced GH fits the evidence while even though the denialists have been trying hard to come up with an alternative forcing, nothing so far holds water”.

BALLS.

http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/20071210/20071211_08.html

And as for Evolution, that is just another example of how something that SCIENCE has NEVER been able to establish firm PROOF for, gets accepted in the public forum through political - philosophical - religious (or anti-religious) manipulation and propagandisation. The crucial thing here being the sheer SCALE of the effort it has taken ABSENT the EVIDENCE that would satisfy the criteria of “science”.

We regard the distortion of “science” by the Nazis and other totalitarian systems with horror, but OUR “civilisation” has merely perpetrated full-scale distortions that have affected the foundations of the morality of society, much more SUCCESSFULLY. Winston Churchill’s comment about humanity descending into a dark abyss lit only by the light of perverted science is very apposite, even though the potential Nazi victory that he had in his mind in saying this, didn’t happen.

PhilBest

Note this little exchange that I've just participated in on Kiwiblog. (Sorry, I can't be bothered typing a fresh comment, and I thought copying and pasting this would say what I want to say here as well).

# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

Yeah, the science is settled, yadda, yadda, yadda.

http://www.dailytech.com/100+Prominent+Scientists+Warn+UN+Attempting+to+Control+Climate+Futile/article10032.htm
# Andrew W Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

The same names Phil, always the same 100 names, though this time they’ve had to chuck in a few “scientist” economists and engineers to get the numbers up.
# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 5:06 pm

Yeah, but look at the CREDENTIALS among that lot.

Where’s the IPCC’s list of the famous “2,500″ with THEIR credentials, AND their input to the reports?

Rule of thumb: if the process has to be secret and public debate has to be censored, it is NOT “science”.

Also, you SAID: “the Earth is warming, it is a global phenomenon, there must be a driver, an enhanced GH fits the evidence while even though the denialists have been trying hard to come up with an alternative forcing, nothing so far holds water”.

BALLS.

http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/20071210/20071211_08.html

And as for Evolution, that is just another example of how something that SCIENCE has NEVER been able to establish firm PROOF for, gets accepted in the public forum through political - philosophical - religious (or anti-religious) manipulation and propagandisation. The crucial thing here being the sheer SCALE of the effort it has taken ABSENT the EVIDENCE that would satisfy the criteria of “science”.

We regard the distortion of “science” by the Nazis and other totalitarian systems with horror, but OUR “civilisation” has merely perpetrated full-scale distortions that have affected the foundations of the morality of society, much more SUCCESSFULLY. Winston Churchill’s comment about humanity descending into a dark abyss lit only by the light of perverted science is very apposite, even though the potential Nazi victory that he had in his mind in saying this, didn’t happen.

PhilBest

Note this little exchange that I've just participated in on Kiwiblog. (Sorry, I can't be bothered typing a fresh comment, and I thought copying and pasting this would say what I want to say here as well).

# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

Yeah, the science is settled, yadda, yadda, yadda.

http://www.dailytech.com/100+Prominent+Scientists+Warn+UN+Attempting+to+Control+Climate+Futile/article10032.htm
# Andrew W Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

The same names Phil, always the same 100 names, though this time they’ve had to chuck in a few “scientist” economists and engineers to get the numbers up.
# PhilBest Says:
December 14th, 2007 at 5:06 pm

Yeah, but look at the CREDENTIALS among that lot.

Where’s the IPCC’s list of the famous “2,500″ with THEIR credentials, AND their input to the reports?

Rule of thumb: if the process has to be secret and public debate has to be censored, it is NOT “science”.

Also, you SAID: “the Earth is warming, it is a global phenomenon, there must be a driver, an enhanced GH fits the evidence while even though the denialists have been trying hard to come up with an alternative forcing, nothing so far holds water”.

BALLS.

http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/20071210/20071211_08.html

And as for Evolution, that is just another example of how something that SCIENCE has NEVER been able to establish firm PROOF for, gets accepted in the public forum through political - philosophical - religious (or anti-religious) manipulation and propagandisation. The crucial thing here being the sheer SCALE of the effort it has taken ABSENT the EVIDENCE that would satisfy the criteria of “science”.

We regard the distortion of “science” by the Nazis and other totalitarian systems with horror, but OUR “civilisation” has merely perpetrated full-scale distortions that have affected the foundations of the morality of society, much more SUCCESSFULLY. Winston Churchill’s comment about humanity descending into a dark abyss lit only by the light of perverted science is very apposite, even though the potential Nazi victory that he had in his mind in saying this, didn’t happen.

robk

Phil

I agree with a lot of that each and every time you posted it! Posted it! Posted it! :-)

Damn the technology!

peter

Phil Best says:

"Winston Churchill’s comment about humanity descending into a dark abyss lit only by the light of perverted science is very apposite, even though the potential Nazi victory that he had in his mind in saying this, didn’t happen."

Liberal people still spend a lot of time warding off the Fascists who want to take NZ to an extreme right wing "Christian" fundmentalist form of government. When this is changed, Exclusive Brethrens will be recognised as genuine comedians rather than a laughing stock as they are now!!

Ho Ho Ho!!!!

dad4justice

"Ho Ho Ho " Is that a Liarbore party mating call dear piffle?

generic viagra

How did homo sapiens evolve into modern humans?
What could have happened for Homo sapiens to become modern humans?
Please be specific!

The comments to this entry are closed.