My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« From the department of can this possibly be right | Main | Better in there than out here »

Comments

Fairfacts Media

A mate has often told me that the difference between a gay guy and a straight one is just a few beers.

dad4justice

What a queer thing to say as getting drunk has nothing to do with this disgusting disorder. I enjoy a beer with my mates and any talk of poofter antics is strictly out of the question. Hell’s bell’s there are still good moral characters on earth that still detest fruit bat faggots.

Researchers have finally pinned down a physical difference between male flies that are engineered to behave homosexually and those that are not: the tweaked variety is missing a small cluster of nerve cells in the brain.

Do gay men have blowflies around their zips? The mere thought of thought of sex with another man revolts me to such a degree that I feel sick in the stomach. .

Of course this is my opinion and if my excoriating critique of homosexuality offends anybody then they must realise that some on the conservative right detest homosexuality and view it as a mental disorder.

I base my opinion on Romans 1 v27; “ the same way men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.”

Rick

haha oh boy, there's a theory for everything.

May come back in here after all the homo supporters start squealing at D4J.

Gets the page hits up I suppose. hahaa

James

Yep! Burn em at the stake for the Lord soooooooo loved them all....

Heh.....Headline:

"Homos smoulder while Peter Burns"

;-)

Rick

Come on guys it's been 6 hours already! No takers?

Ok how about this...

um...

If straight guys turn gay after drinking beer, what beverage turns gays straight?

And if sexual orientation can be changed by a drink, why the hell are we handing out extra rights to drunks mascarading as gays?

Anyone? anyone? Bueller?

Jim

All this experiment tells you is that drunk fruit flies can't tell the difference between male and female. A quick trip to a singles bar would confirm this in humans :-)

Lucyna

Probably more to do with inhibitions being loosened by drink - so I'm not sure what the reverse would entail.

Religion, maybe?

James

Religion, maybe?"

Yep....if its unwanted homosexual attraction you are after hanging about the clergy is a sure bet to getting it.....;-)

peter

Interesting references:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071030184518.htm

http://www.newsweek.com/id/83086

where it says:
"Anyone versed in psychopharmacology is aware that ethanol (the alcohol found in adult beverages) causes a release of GABA (gamma amino butyric acid). GABA levels are also increased during sex. Repeated increase and decrease of GABA levels in the blood of humans (and flies!!) will induce GABA-seeking behaviors in the GABA-deprived state. Thus, ethanol- (GABA-) deprived flies and humans will engage in behaviors that attempt offset this chemical imbalance at any cost."

dad4justice

peter - a GABA a day keeps the gays at play . I think I'll just stick to swatting flies thank you very much .

dave crampton

Its obvious! why do you think they call them "fruit" flies?

peter

Interesting comment from Cliff Richard:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Cliff-Richard-The-Church-Should-Accept-Homosexuality-15057.shtml

How is that fundamentalists?

peter

And here is a link for Daddy 4 in particular, but also for you Andrei.

The reader is challenged to answer this question:

DID YOU CHOOSE YOUR SEXUAL ORIENTATION?

peter

The link for my last post:

http://www.reluctantjourney.co.uk/

dad4justice

peter, homosexuality is a persistent preoccupation with erotic encounters involving members of the same sex, which may or may not be acted out with another person . Put it another way, as I know you struggle with things peter, it is making a deliberate plan to entertain and co-operate in sex, which is vastly different from questioning our sexual orientation because of the presence of occasional same – sex attractions.

Having the attractions (whether it be a fruit fly or a pissed politician, drunken sailor etc.…) are obviously part of the torment and struggle, but they are not something for which we are morally responsible. It’s when we begin planning to entertain the attractions in fantasy or behaviour that we cross the line.

I believe many research studies that have failed to prove that people are born homosexuals. It is pure myth and many research findings show that nongenetic factors play a significant part in shaping sexual preference. The research also shows a “significantly higher percentage of alcohol and drug use “ among both males and females who participate in homosexual activities (pp.110-111 Straight and Narrow)

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brothers eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye”

Jesus’words remind us that if we see others’ sin without seeing our own more deeply, then we’ve negated our right and privilege to invite them to a different kind of life. Therefore, I must base my efforts on being a better Christlike friend to those struggling with homosexuality on the confession and growing demise of my own self righteousness.

I have cleansed myself from the unsavoury world of kiwiblog so it should be that much easier to seek my objective.

peter

Daddy 4

Yours is a noble attempt to tap into your intellect, but really it takes the discussion no further than where it has always been.

You are in good company however, because luminaries like Andrei and Ian consistently miss the point as well.

The principal argument is not whether same sex orientation is defined at birth, or later. It is not about relationships between father and son (or perhaps mother and daughter?) that may or may not be influential.

It is a matter of human rights - what we selfishly claim for ourselves and what we may deny another.

Christian churches have been notoriously unjust when in comes to human rights. For example when debates about homosexual ministers have been happening at Presbyterian and Methodist assemblies - it seems that God has been answwering prayers giving 60 per cent support to one side and 40 per cent to the other!

Meanwhile the Roman Catholic leadership persist in their gay old way (while claiming homosezuality is sin) as they lead half the world's Christian population all over the highway.

Meanwhile, Christian fundmentalists desperately try to retrofit a few insignificant verses from a very outdated Bible onto contemporary thought with no success at all.

All fundamentalists should be put on notice that the issue is dead, decided, encoded in law these past 20 years. Move on from this senseless handwringing that is sending a simple message to all NZ parents - don't meddle with Christianity!!!

Rick

Interesting comment from Eddie Van Halen:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Van-Halen-Homos-Should-Accept-They-Are-Merely-Drunk-15057.shtml

How is that fundamentalist homo activists?

Prof. Von Glinkerhoffen

Good Day to you all,

Perhaps an experienced trapper can help me:

I would like to trap some homo's to put in the zoo. I have dug a large hole in the park near the public toilets, but am unsure of the correct bait. Will some rotting fruit do?

Thanks in Advance,

Prof. Von Glinkerhoffen
Director,
The New Comtemporary Zoo of Acceptance.


KevOB

To argue that ethanol aka booze is a cause of homosexuality is futile. We are responsible for conduct so if the libido is misdirected correct it.

The New Testament is clear homosexuals will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. The old Mosaic law is irrelevant. We can legislate as much as we like but we cannot nullify God's instructions.

dad4justice

"Yours is a noble attempt to tap into your intellect, but really it takes the discussion no further than where it has always been."

Really Peter .
With regrads
Peter Joseph Burns .

The comments to this entry are closed.