My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« Just testing | Main | Labour signs its own death warrant »

Comments

God

Ian, you are a noob

HORansome

As someone who was also at the debate I will agree that Craig won the debate, but mostly because Bill Cook wasn't very good. Craig's arguments were unsophisticated, lacking substance, (and having heard him in his professional capacity as a philosopher I know he knows better) and designed to appeal to the masses. Cook, who you'd think would know a little basic stats and cosmology, just wasn't in Craig's league when it came to presenting ideas. A great shame, really.

ropata

I would have loved to see G.K. Chesterton debate Bertrand Russell or George Bernard Shaw

CN

The whole Craig tour is detailed on: http://www.christiannews.co.nz/

I am really appreciative of Bill Cooke for fronting for the debate. He is a brave guy as Craig is the master of many many debates. Good on the Bills!!! I hope the Palmerston North debate goes well for you both too!

CN

A review of the Auckland debate:

http://mandmandmandm.blogspot.com/2008/06/battle-of-bills-review-of-craig-cooke.html

Madeleine

A video of the Auckland debate is available on MandM
http://mandmandmandm.blogspot.com/

Brian

Full MP3 Audio of the William Lane Craig vs Bill Cooke debate can be found here.

The comments to this entry are closed.