My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« IPCC scientists hacked, emails leaked, damning… | Main | The Day The Science Died…: »

Comments

vg

publish now

getstaffed

I've been tracking this for quite a few hours now. There is, apparently, enough evidence in the papers & emails to be seriously embarrassing to the climitista alarmists. But will the MSM (who still largely control public opinion) pay this story more than lip service? I doubt it.

Mike Lorrey

In politics, where there is smoke, there is always fire. Always.

I am only surprised that Jones had the intelligence to not try to deny and cover up the breach. Perhaps he thinks it doesn't really matter, that he and his alarmists have enough momentum politically to force a socialist revolution in the name of climate upon us...

Ross

Someone give that 'hacker' a Nobel Prize!

Eloi

I'm not surprised that Jones hasn't called the police. Too afraid he'd be taken away in handcuffs, I guess.

Geckko

These reads like a spoof.

Is that a genuine quote from Phil Jones?

Ian Wishart

No spoof. Taped i/v. Story in 30 mins.

getstaffed

Ian, well done getting this one. There must be a lot of spin being created to counter the impending dose of sunlight

Ezzthetic

This is sounding more and more ridiculous. Jones "hasn't talked to the police", but for some reason gave an exclusive interview to a web site known for its hostility to climate science.

Is there any evidence their site was hacked into at all? Isn't it more likely the files are just files already released under an FOI request?

And how were they ever on RealClimate's site? I didn't see them.

Even if the files are real, how do we know they haven't been doctored? Some original extracts sounded plausible. Now they're sounding as if they were concocted to confirm familiar right-wing talking-points.

You would have to be crazy to base any conclusions on this information.

Dave

Phil will be more embarrassed when
pdj_grant_since1990.xls hits wide
circulation.

13 million quid.

getstaffed

Dave - low-carbon, low-emission, eco-friendly estates don't come cheap. What's a top scientist supposed to do?

Nimby

I don't see any relevance or proof in that quoting. It's all absurd, a hoax probably: with this bombshell, someone wants to delegitimate sceptic science. Be very careful with those emails, they sound so strange to me.

WestWright

A very smart IT guy has verified this as legitimate, see here: http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/11/hacked-hadley-cru-foi2009-files.html#more

melanie

It looks like a leaker ive read the files but have lots to go ,the info fits the actions and the findings of lord monckton ,even the temps were correct as was the cancelled game ,its true alright .

Boballab

Well some of the emails have been confirmed as 100% Authentic. Steve McIntyre on ClimateAudit says the ones that are in the zip are his.

larry Weitzman

The best question is "Have you alerted the police?" Was that a double entendre? The police should be arresting the scientists in the emails for fraud and conspiracy on stealing the public's money based on lies and fraud.

ayrdale

This is real, and it's a major scientific and political scandal. The BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, WSJ are all carrying it.

This hacker, or inside leaker has pointed the smoking gun at the green left.

Watch how the lefties at Hot Topic handle it, see comments at...

http://hot-topic.co.nz/rudd-brooks-no-denial/

Freezer

TGIF is referenced everywhere, incl Fox:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,576009,00.html
Weel done Ian on getting a response from this non scientist.

R2D2

Real Climate is claiming that the decline is simply the divergence problem and it is all fine.

The question I would ask is, if the proxy doesn't match the temperature record now, how do you know the proxy would have matched the instrumental record in 1000AD?

The comments to this entry are closed.