Green ‘scientists’ lobby group gave membership to dog.
Green ‘scientists’ lobby group gave membership to dog
« BREAKING: Stricken ship involved in earlier near collision – report | Main | BREAKING NEWS: CONFIRMED – RENA NEARLY HIT OIL TANKER »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Typical.
Just like all that 'robust' IPCC over exaggerated faux science rubbish. Where many of the socalled 'lead authors' actually work for the WWF!
Along with that laughable US NAS Climate Choices propaganda report.
When is a science report not a science report. When its written by the NAS. since some of the lead authors of the Climate choices report weren't actually scientists either!
Posted by: AcidComments | October 09, 2011 at 05:26 PM
BREAKING: An IPCC backchannel ‘cloud’ was apparently established to hide IPCC deliberations from FOIA.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/17/breaking-an-ipcc-backchannel-cloud-was-apparently-established-to-hide-ipcc-deliberations-from-foia/
Posted by: AcidComments | October 18, 2011 at 08:37 AM
Climate change to flood link – no evidence
Another climate FAIL. Add this to tornadoes and hurricanes not being linked either, and you find that the entire Joe Romm / Bill McKibben alarming industrial complex of doubtful linkages between weather and climate has pretty much collapsed.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/24/climate-change-to-flood-link-no-evidence/
Posted by: AcidComments | October 26, 2011 at 10:20 AM
It is my honor and privileged to found and read your post. It made me learn a lot of different ideas. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: kirkland dermatology | December 31, 2011 at 07:39 PM
You mention truth issue on that stuff. I think you described it in a professional way. I hope you go further in this way, with your excellent way of writing articles.
Posted by: kirkland dermatology | February 19, 2012 at 07:10 AM
You mention truth issue on that stuff. I think you described it in a professional way. I hope you go further in this way, with your excellent way of writing articles.
Posted by: Seattle tattoo removal | March 03, 2012 at 06:15 PM