Page One of a witness statement in regard to alleged criminal acts by a Dunedin Police officer Download sutton1a.pdf
A clip from an interview with a former sex worker (voice altered) about police demanding free sex because of an arrangement with the brothel owners Download policebrothels.mp3
UPDATE: PRIME MINISTER HELEN CLARK said tonight she wouldn't be holding Broad accountable for something that happened when he was 23. The incident apparently happened in 1981, and according to the timeline in the Herald today Broad was 25 or 26. I only raise this if the spin continues to be "he was only 23"...
The MP3 is crap and unintelligible...I hope your other evidence is somewhat better...
Posted by: James | May 13, 2007 at 11:00 PM
The MP3 had to be altered to disguise the voice...but it is recognisable as a direct quote from the magazine article.
What she says is in the article...the significance of the clip is purely its existence...
And James...there is far, far more than that. You seem to be an apologist for psychopathic police rapists...yes?
Posted by: ian | May 13, 2007 at 11:17 PM
And James...there is far, far more than that. You seem to be an apologist for psychopathic police rapists...yes?"
How typical...an ad hominen attack in reply to an observation on the quality of a piece of evidence...you and labour deserve each other.you are both nasty and anti human.
Ps....hows that illegitimate kid you fathered in The States getting on? Practising your "family values" are you?
Posted by: James | May 14, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Ooooooooh Burn!
Posted by: maynard | May 14, 2007 at 12:05 PM
What...you missed the wall to wall TV and womens magazine coverage at the time? Must have been the only one.
Like I said, you show a staggering lack of concern for the women who've been raped by police officers...
Posted by: ian | May 14, 2007 at 01:38 PM
"What...you missed the wall to wall TV and womens magazine coverage at the time? Must have been the only one."
No....just making sure your holier than thou self doesn't start having memory lapses..
Like I said, you show a staggering lack of concern for the women who've been raped by police officers..."
How did you arrive at that conclusion? I simply said that it was a crap bit of evidence meaning it wasn't clear what was said...maybe you mistook what I meant.
Posted by: James | May 14, 2007 at 02:02 PM
If he can't be held accountable for his actions at the age of 23 (or 25-26) at what age should he be held accountable for his choices and actions ? And why would you give someone a badge and a job if they're not old enough to be held accountable yet ?
Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2007 at 03:15 PM
Nobody is interested in Howard Broad at age 26. He committed no criminal offence. Accumulating reliable evidence would be a hassle. I certainly cannot remember who attended every gathering I attended in the 1980's
It is how he is performing his role today that matters.
Remember Benson-Pope and Parker? Another fizzler coming up.
Posted by: peter | May 15, 2007 at 03:21 PM