My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« What the teacher told me | Main | Tieing the knot in prison »

Comments

dad4justice

You are wrong belt and check whale oil's blog to see response from CYFSwatch.

What a cowardly place the internet is .

Goodbye !!!

Andrew Davies

Unrelated, but related if you know what I mean. This is by a maverick US democrat.

I have a plan to destroy America
by Richard D. Lamm

I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall, and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” Here is my plan:

1. We must first make America a bilingual-bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with its Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.

3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently, “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved, not by tolerance, but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically, and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with a salad bowl metaphor. It is important to insure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences, rather than Americans emphasizing their similarities.

4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest-growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate from school.

5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was all the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

6. I would establish dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would “celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other–that is, when they are not killing each other. A “diverse,” peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia.

Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf’s “World History” tells us: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games in honor of Zeus, and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet, all of these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors … (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions …)” If we can put the emphasis on the “pluribus,” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

7. Then I would place all these subjects off-limits–make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist”, “xenophobe” halt argument and conversation. Having made America a bilingual-bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “victimology,” I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra –”because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.

8. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book “Mexifornia” –this book is dangerous; it exposes my plan to destroy America. So please, please–if you feel that America deserves to be destroyed–please, please–don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” –Noam Chomsky, American linguist and U.S. media and foreign policy critic.

Posted in: Matricula Consula, Political Correctness

peter

John Boy says:

"One could be forgiven for wondering why someone from some violent, lawless place in Africa would become a refugee to escape but then bring the same crap they are escaping from to the country generous enough to take them. If you want to escape to somewhere better at least have the good manners to not act like an arsehole when you get there."

As I said before John, the record of refugees in NZ is generally very good, even if we expect them to flourish after just 6 weeks at the Mangere institution

dad4justice

Dear belt - Peter

Do I sin every time I fail to do a good deed ?

When we realize how much good we leave undone,we realize how far we are from God's standards.It's easy to be overcome with guilt.

But the grace of god can reassure those who are in Christ that there is no condemnation(Romans 8:1).

We fall short,but we fall into the safety net of GRACE.

Peter
Born in NZ

Acid Comments

"As I said before John, the record of refugees in NZ is generally very good, even if we expect them to flourish after just 6 weeks at the Mangere institution"


Go and live in Hamilton.

You might end up changing your mind!

BTW: My Police Intel contacts been 'concerned on what's been happening in the Mosques there aswell.

Also My brother nearly had his car 'car-jacked' by 4 Afghani Refugees when he also lived there aswell!

Craig

Try living in the Mt Albert/Sandringham/Mt Roskill triangle also, often see Groups of boys with Knifes etc. My Cousin was threatened by a boy because she was trying to help the boys relative. Moved out of that area due to the house being broken into and car vandalised. All the above acts committed by Somali youths. Caught two in my Girlfriends house, went to take them on until the knife came out. Police unable to send a dog to track as too busy in that area. Message I would like to give is please come here by all means if you need too, but respect our ways and lifestyle when here, easy and simple.

Andrew McIntosh

Late last year I flew return between Hamilton and Wellington airports. There was no security checking at all from either airport.

It made me wonder at the time what would happen if someone hijacked that plane and redirected it into L9 of the Beehive?

Using a small plane may not be as spectacular as a big plane but it does seem likely that it could kill a significant number of people?

Speaking from a relatively uninformed point of view it seems that our nations airport security is not up to scratch and is in need of a review to tighten it up further, without going over the top?

Psycho Milt

It made me wonder at the time what would happen if someone hijacked that plane and redirected it into L9 of the Beehive?

Do some thinking about this:

1. How big is the plane that flies between Hamilton and Wellington? The Beehive's a pretty substantial building - most domestic planes wouldn't do more than inconvenience it.

2. Airline passengers are now very familiar with the concept that hijackers must not be allowed to get control of the plane if you want to survive. Taking over a plane isn't easy any more.

3. It's hard to imagine why anyone would trouble themselves to try and crash a plane into the Beehive, when you can just walk up to the front door.

Given the above, what's the likely cost/benefit ratio of hassling us at domestic airports with bullshit security arrangements? My guess would be, somewhere down in "Don't touch it with a barge-pole" territory.

Rumpole

The Somali's locally have no visible intention of integrating as evidenced by the wearing of cultural clothes, not speaking english and continuing to use local customs that are unacceptable.Happy to take refugees who become Kiwis, those that do not wish to integrate should be financially helped to return to a country were they can.

The comments to this entry are closed.