My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« UN IPCC boss has fingers in carbon trading pie | Main | The funniest environmental political debate you'll witness »

Comments

pollution

I think you should visit http://www.thepollutions.com
for more information.

Shane Ponting

Why, so we can read about Global Worming ROFL

Fairfacts Media

I posted this too.
The EU Referendum blog has been producing some excellent posts and observations.
If only our media was as diverse as the british.
And did you see the 500 peer reviewed papers that also doubt AGW theory?.

cbullitt

Yeah I had this this a.m. here. Outstanding, now if the US media would quit covering for these worms, I wouldn't have to explain the obvious to so many people.

CM

Wow, that is woeful. Ian, I can't believe you're stooping to the level of promoting sure an obvious crock......schoolboy stuff.

CM

(should have been 'such' an obvious crock)

>>>If only our media was as diverse as the british.<<<

I agree, but this certainly isn't evidence for it.

BammBamm

CM:

Can you still do maths - or are you a victim of tomorrows schools also?

lemon ade

So, why did John Key go to Copenhgen? Can our govt not make it's own decisions? Why did we bother voting National at all?

CM

>>>Can you still do maths - or are you a victim of tomorrows schools also?<<<

I can do some maths. Can you? Can you do a rubik's cube? How about staying up for an entire Telethon?

>>>Why did we bother voting National at all?<<<

I could have told you that before you voted National.

Falafulu Fisi

CM said...
Wow, that is woeful. Ian, I can't believe you're stooping to the level of promoting sure an obvious crock......schoolboy stuff.

CM, your arguments here on Ian's blog is schoolboy stuff. You're not arguing about the science but more of a piss take. You made comments for the sake of it.

CM

I started arguing only about the science but it soon became a joke and most of my questions were answered by gormless rote conspiracy theory responses that addressed nothing. So naturally I gave up on that. Now I just mock people for being stupid.

How many of these 100 reasons do you stand by Falafulu? It's comedy gold.

Mack

That's right CM, the science soon becomes a joke..a quack CO2 theory.

Falafulu Fisi

CM, I put a question to you, and you came back with what?

None.

Same old, piss taking. Do you want to start arguing about science CM or are you just an illiterate science wannabe, assuming that you know about science but actually all you know is toilet cleaning? Am I correct?

Let's hit the science, shall we?

CM

>>>CM, I put a question to you, and you came back with what?<<<

Where was the question?

>>>. Do you want to start arguing about science CM or are you just an illiterate science wannabe, assuming that you know about science but actually all you know is toilet cleaning? Am I correct?<<<

I know enough about toilet cleaning to get by.
I know some climate science basics.

>>>Let's hit the science, shall we?<<<

Sure, let's start with this list Ian is promoting and that you obviously endorse as well.

Mack

CM You are the one with with the quack CO2 theory mate. The quack CO2 theory belongs to you . It's up to you to prove your CO2 theory is not quack. I've got 100 reasons saying your theory is quack.
Where's your list of reasons to prove otherwise?

Mack

And BTW CM I also just mock people for being stupid.
Aahahahahaha.

CM

>>>CM, your arguments here on Ian's blog is schoolboy stuff.<<<

That should be "are schoolboy stuff", not "is schoolboy stuff". That's schoolboy stuff.

CM

>>>CM You are the one with with the quack CO2 theory mate. The quack CO2 theory belongs to you.<<<

Saying something twice doesn't make it true.

>>>It's up to you to prove your CO2 theory is not quack. I've got 100 reasons saying your theory is quack.
Where's your list of reasons to prove otherwise?<<<

I've got the rebuttal to your hundred reasons already and I haven't even seen them.

CM

>>>And BTW CM I also just mock people for being stupid.
Aahahahahaha.<<<

Good on you. Idiot. (Kidding)

Mack

CM, "I've got the rebuttal to your 100 reasons ALREADY AND I HAVEN"T EVEN SEEN THEM."
Well doesn't that perfectly demonstrate what a closed-minded,brainwashed idiot you are then CM. (not kidding)

The comments to this entry are closed.