A long-forgotten scientific paper on temperature trends in New Zealand may be the smoking gun on temperature manipulation worldwide.
Since Climategate first broke, we've seen scandal over temperature adjustments by NZ's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research, NIWA, which in turn prompted a fresh look at raw temperature data from Darwin and elsewhere.
Now, a study published in the NZ Journal of Science back in 1980 reveals weather stations at the heart of NIWA's claims of massive warming were shown to be unreliable and untrustworthy by a senior Met Office climate scientist 30 years ago, long before global warming became a politically charged issue.
The story is published in tonight's TGIF Edition, and has international ramifications.
That's because the study's author, former Met Office Auckland director Jim Hessell, found a wide range of problems with Stevenson Screen temperature stations and similar types of unit.
Hessell debunked a claim that New Zealand was showing a 1C warming trend between 1940 and 1980, saying the sites showing the biggest increases were either urbanized and suffering from urban heat island effect, or they were faulty Stevenson Screen installations prone to showing hotter than normal temperatures because of their design and location.
One of the conclusions is that urbanized temperature stations are almost a waste of time in climate study:
"For the purpose of assessing climatic change, a 'rural' environment needs to be carefully defined. Climatic temperature trends can only be assessed from rural sites which have suffered no major transformations due to changes in shelter or urbanisation, or from sites for which the records have been made homogenous. Urban environments usually suffer continual modifications due to one cause or another."
"It is concluded that the warming trends in New Zealand previously claimed, are in doubt and that as has been found in Australia (Tucker 1975) no clear evidence for long term secular warming or cooling in Australasia over the last 50 years [1930-1980] exists as yet."
Hessell divided weather stations in New Zealand into two classes, "A" and "B", where A class locations had suffered increasing urbanization or significant site changes, and B class locations had not.
"It can be seen immediately that the average increase in mean temperatures at the A class stations is about five times that of the B class", the study notes.
Among the studies listed as a contaminated A site is Kelburn, which was at the heart of the NIWA scandal a fortnight ago.
A link to the study can be found in TGIF Edition.
Other suggested reading: Air Con
Ian, you've done it again. Great work. The huge importance of this paper is the date. If this paper had been published today "denialist" claims would be all over it from alarmists and the MSM.I really wonder what the alarmists and MSM response will be to this? Throw mud at Hessell, try and tarnish the messenger because the message is beyond a counter argument? No. The alarmists and MSM are now well backed into a corner and their only response will be to ignore it and keep pretending that the public are uninformed idiots. The death of scientific integrity (due to the alarmists political goals)will be closely followed by the slow but inevitable death of the MSM. Salinger pwned again.
Posted by: MSR | December 19, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Congratulations on the unearthing of Hessel's 1980 paper.
As one who gathered climate data in the 1980s, I can vouch for the unreliability of the manual Stevenson screen readings.
Unfortunately this never deterred NZ scientists from using them in their publications.
If it had been processed by a statistical computer model, it was deemed to have been "ennobled".
Publish or perish is the ruling motive.
Posted by: RPH | December 20, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Apology to Jim Hessell for misspelling his name.
Posted by: RPH | December 20, 2009 at 12:16 AM
E.M. Smith, blogging as Chiefio has done a big set on the GHCN stations, with similar conclusions.
Posted by: Adam Gallon | December 20, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Ian , great work. The next bit of digging should include what exactly was going on at the Uni. of Exeter in the early 1980s. Too much seems to trace back to them ( Jim Sallinger included). Was this all related to Thatcher poring money into Climate research to beat off the coal miners / unions ?
Posted by: Ross | December 20, 2009 at 11:13 AM
It's amazing how bald-faced these scientists can be; they have no compunction whatsoever in lying to produce the result they want, even knowing the results are far from accurate.
Posted by: Fletch | December 20, 2009 at 01:20 PM
Ian,
Brilliant work, thank you.
By the way, I love your book. I'm still reading it. It's very very useful.
Steve
Posted by: Steve Netwriter | December 21, 2009 at 06:04 PM
I'll say NZ is important! Here is the release from the Met.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/subsets.html
"Subsets" Ha. Look at NZ. Every station is used for the subset. But not one at Taiwan. They love stations near large Australian cities, but not elsewhere.
Posted by: Jason | December 24, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Blogs are so interactive where we get lots of informative on any topics nice job keep it up !!
Posted by: dissertation | February 06, 2010 at 07:50 PM
It's amazing how bald-faced these scientists can be; they have no compunction whatsoever in lying to produce the result they want, even knowing the results are far from accurate.
Posted by: Term Paper | February 17, 2010 at 08:00 PM
Your information help me a lot. Good job.keep it up. Thanks!
Posted by: Tamon | April 11, 2010 at 02:53 PM
Thank you so much for all the information. These will surely be a great help.
Posted by: Tana | May 31, 2010 at 01:18 PM
this is a very intresting article...great content i'm really impressed by your thoughts thanks for sharing your experience
Posted by: Tanya | September 21, 2010 at 05:04 PM
I never like comments but your post enforce me a lot.Your post was really very attractive that's why my heart ask me to do comments & i do so.Fantastc work you have done & you should carry on.
Posted by: Dissertation Topics | June 07, 2012 at 10:02 PM
It contain all the significant basics to create the sympathetic of your thesis samples document easier and give a systematize plus brief symbol of the topic. It also outline all the ladder on your way to receiving your answer to the problems you have set in the thesis samples
Posted by: thesis | June 27, 2012 at 05:58 PM
It contain all the significant basics to create the sympathetic of your thesis samples document easier and give a systematize plus brief symbol of the topic. It also outline all the ladder on your way to receiving your answer to the problems you have set in the thesis samples
Posted by: thesis | June 27, 2012 at 06:02 PM
Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your site loads up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate hyperlink for your host? I desire my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol
Posted by: รับทำวิทยานิพนธ์ | October 26, 2013 at 04:12 AM