My Photo
Mobilise this Blog

Google

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATEMAGAZINE.TV

Kiwiblog

New Zealand Conservative

InvestigatePodcast

AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] investigatemagazine.com and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« More top 10 global warming myths debunked | Main | Climate Depot mauls IPCC report over new error »

Comments

CM

Gosman:

"The benefit of having Anti-AGW Skeptics decrying shonky practices is that they have to acknowledge their own shonky practice in return or look like hypocrites"

http://hot-topic.co.nz/herald-censures-ipcc-on-flimsy-grounds/#comment-10149

Oops, guess that's the end of tacit support for Gosman. I'm reading Air Con and it's chock-full of very weak sources supporting statements/'facts' that absolutely require/deserve primary evidence sources.
So far it's all mostly junkscience, which has a substantial bias. Wouldn't you have much better credibility if you relied on the source information rather than quoting their interpretation?

http://junkscience.com/Junkman.html

AcidComments


AGW/CC is Junk science on 'steroids'.

Full of gross exaggerations, fraud, 'voodoo science' astrology flawed useless computer projections, propaganda hype, hype and yet more hype!

Not worth anything unless you're a diehard believer or a stupid politician trying to suck the teat and lick the backside of the UN for Brownie Point scoring.

Corrupt Science, Fraud Science, Flawed Science, Hijacked Science and Inept Science. That's AGW/CC for you.

CM

>>>AGW/CC is Junk science on 'steroids'.

Full of gross exaggerations, fraud, 'voodoo science' astrology flawed useless computer projections, propaganda hype, hype and yet more hype!

Not worth anything unless you're a diehard believer or a stupid politician trying to suck the teat and lick the backside of the UN for Brownie Point scoring.

Corrupt Science, Fraud Science, Flawed Science, Hijacked Science and Inept Science. That's AGW/CC for you.<<<

Excellent effort. I like the flow. You've managed to get four paragraphs in while avoiding saying anything specific. You've got the incompetence, conspiracy and fraud trifecta.

Clearly an experienced operator at the top of his game.

9 out of 10

The comments to this entry are closed.