My Photo
Mobilise this Blog





New Zealand Conservative


AmCam News Tips

  • Have you got mobile camera pix of breaking news, or a first-hand account you've written?
    email Investigate now on publicity [at] and we'll get you online
Blog powered by Typepad

« More scandal in Climategate review - another panellist biased | Main | Greens 'hoist on their own petard' »


Maurice J

The Null Hypothesis of AGW, first proposed in 1938, ironically as a good thing (People in the 1930's feared a coming ice age) is DOWN THE TOILET, and all sides of the debate know it. However AGW Pushers and their Useful Idiot followers will continue pushing the scam for some time yet.
In the real world ANY Scientific Hypothesis requires Empirical supporting Evidence to validate it. No such Evidence has ever been found period, therefor AGW is a NULL HYPOTHESIS.


>>>The admission that the MWP may have been warmer than present global temperatures<<<

Ian, where does he 'admit' this? Please don't tell me it's where he is discussing hypotheticals ("if" and then "on the other hand")?

The comments to this entry are closed.